Outcome-Based AI ProjectPropTech·July 2025

Property Valuation Dashboard with 3rd-Party API Integrations, 98% Accuracy

A seed-stage PropTech startup needed a property valuation dashboard with integrations to multiple real estate data APIs — in 3 weeks. Kovil AI delivered with 98% data accuracy and a UI that landed their first enterprise client.

3 wks

Time to Delivery

On-spec, on-time

98%

Data Accuracy

Vs. manual valuation

3

Data APIs Integrated

Unified in one view

1st

Enterprise Client

Signed using demo

Client type: Seed-Stage Startup
Timeline: 3 weeks
Team: 2 engineers

Tech Stack

Next.js 14TypeScriptAttom Data APIRentcast APIGoogle Maps APIRechartsPostgreSQL

"We'd been quoted 3 months by two other agencies. Kovil AI scoped it in a day, built it in 3 weeks, and the output was genuinely beautiful. Our first enterprise prospect said the product felt more polished than tools they'd been paying $500/month for."

David Kim, CEO

The Situation

the client was building a data intelligence platform for commercial real estate investors — helping them evaluate acquisition targets faster by aggregating multiple property data sources into a single view. The founders had validated demand through interviews with 30+ investors and had a design spec ready.

What they needed was a functional product, fast. They were presenting at a PropTech accelerator demo day in four weeks and wanted to show a live product, not a Figma prototype.

The Challenge

The core technical challenge was data integration. The real estate data ecosystem is fragmented: property transactions sit in one API, rental comparables in another, zoning data in a third, and none of them were designed to work together. Key challenges:

  • Three external APIs (Attom Data, Rentcast, Google Maps) with different rate limits, data formats, and reliability characteristics
  • Property search needed to handle partial addresses, parcel IDs, and polygon-based area searches
  • Valuation calculations required combining data from multiple sources — with transparent methodology visible to users
  • The UI had to be intuitive for non-technical real estate professionals — investors who would not tolerate a developer-facing tool

Our Approach

After a one-day scoping session, we identified the core user journey: an investor enters an address, sees a valuation estimate with confidence score, reviews comparable transactions, and saves properties to a watchlist. Everything else was secondary.

We built a caching and normalization layer to handle the API reliability and rate limit problems — external API responses are cached by property identifier, with TTLs matched to each data source's update frequency. This also made the dashboard feel fast even when external APIs were slow.

The valuation model used a weighted comparable sales methodology — transparent to users, with the underlying comparables visible and filterable. We deliberately avoided black-box valuations, because investors we interviewed said they needed to be able to justify valuations to their LPs.

The Solution

The three-week sprint delivered:

  • Property search: Address autocomplete, parcel ID lookup, and map-based polygon search for area analysis
  • Unified property profile: Property details, transaction history, current estimated value, rent estimate, and zoning information — all on one page
  • Comparable transactions viewer: Filterable grid of comparable sales with distance, recency, and similarity scoring; adjustable weights for the valuation model
  • Market trend charts: Price per square foot trends, days on market, and rental yield by area — built with Recharts for smooth, interactive visualization
  • Watchlist and notes: Save properties with private notes and receive email alerts on significant value changes
  • Export: One-click PDF report generation for sharing with LPs or deal partners

Results

the client used the dashboard live at the accelerator demo day. They closed their first enterprise client — a family office managing $200M in real estate assets — within two weeks of the event, directly attributing the decision to the product demo. The client described the UI as "more polished than tools they'd been paying $500/month for." Data accuracy, validated against a set of independently sourced comparable sales, came in at 98%.

Start Your Project

See the engagement model that fits your situation.